Logo

Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?

15.06.2025 08:09

Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?

For some atheists, however, the argument is convincing.

A rational person can easily refute a flat-earther argument that the surface of the Earth is not curved. For a flat-earther, however, his (or her) argument against a curved earth, is convincing.

Question: Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?

Has anyone ever participated in a gang bang and what was it like?

Similarly, a religious person can easily refute the argument

Existence of evil => God doesn’t exist

They bring up the argument because they find it convincing.

What are the differences between fuzzy, intuitionistic, and paraconsistent logic? Which one is considered the most useful and why?